PALESTINA E TRIBUNAL PENAL INTERNACIONAL
RETORNO A UMA SAGA JUDICIAL
Keywords:
Palestine, Israel, International Criminal Court, international criminal justiceAbstract
At a time when the International Criminal Court is sometimes harshly criticized about its impartiality, mainly because of its focus on the African continent, Palestine’s action at this Court appears as a real challenge to consolidate the credibility of international criminal justice and to move towards the universalization of the Rome Statute, as well as a decisive framework for the evolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, for the recognition of Palestine as a state on the international scene and, more generally, for peace in the Middle East.
References
M. EYNARD, “La relation juridique entre la Palestine et le Procureur de la Cour pénale internationale”, in T. GARCIA (dir.), La Palestine: d’un État non membre de l’Organisation des Nations Unies à un État souverain?, Paris, Pedone, 2016.
R. CHARVIN, “Droit international et conflit israélo-palestinien”, comunicação apresentada no colóquio “Où en est la Palestine?, organizado por R. PORTEILLA e P. ICARD, na Universidade de Bourgogne (França), em 18 de novembro de 2014.
C. MAIA, K. HAMA, “La Cour pénale internationale vue d’Afrique: organe juridictionnel ou organe politique?”, L’Observateur des Nations Unies, vol. 32, 2012, pp. 75-98.
C. MAIA, “Les positions politiques et les justifications juridiques des États au regard de la reconnaissance (ou non reconnaissance) de la qualité d’État de la Palestine”, in T. GARCIA (dir.), La Palestine: d’un État non membre de l’Organisation des Nations Unies à un État souverain?, Paris, Pedone, 2016, pp. 95-125.
Y. RONEN, “Recognition of the State of Palestine: Still too Much too Soon?”, in C. CHINKIN, F. BAETENS (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 229-247.
R. BERMEJO GARCÍA, “¿Es Palestina un Estado? Reflexiones a la luz del derecho internacional y de la práctica europea sobre los acontecimientos recientes en torno al reconocimiento de un Estado palestino”, Revista de Estudios Europeos, vol. 65, 2014, pp. 9-40.
M.M. EL ZEIDY, “Ad hoc Declarations of Acceptance of Jurisdiction: The Palestinian Situation under Scrutiny”, in C. STAHN (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 179-209.
J. QUIGLEY, “Palestine is a State so the Consent Declaration is a Valid Basis for Investigation by the ICC”, in R.H. STEINBERG (ed.), Contemporary Issues facing the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Brill/Nijhoff, 2016, pp. 39-50.
C. MELONI, G. TOGNONI (eds.), Is There a Court for Gaza? A Test Bench for International Justice, The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2012.
J. DUGARD, “Palestine and the International Criminal Court: Institutional Failure or Bias?”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 11, 2013, pp. 563-570.
A. ZIMMERMANN, “Palestine and the International Criminal Court Quo Vadis? Reach and Limits of Declarations Under Article 12(3)”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 11, 2013, pp. 303-329.
M.C. KEARNEY, “Palestine and the International Criminal Court”, in Palestine and International Law: New Approaches. Proceedings of the Conference held in Birzeit University, on 24- 26 September 2010, Birzeit, Birzeit University, Institute of Law, 2011, pp. 137-148.
W.T. WORSTER, “The Exercise of Jurisdiction by the International Criminal Court over Palestine”, The American University International Law Review, vol. 26, 2011, pp. 1153-1209.
D. BENOLIEL, R. PERRY, “Israel, Palestine, and the ICC”, Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 32, 2010, pp. 73-127.
TPI, Gabinete do Procurador, “Situation in Palestine”, comunicado de imprensa, 3 de abril de 2012.
A. PELLET, “Les effets de la reconnaissance par la Palestine de la compétence de la Cour pénale internationale”, in Mélanges en l’honneur de Madjid Benchikh. Droit, liberté, paix, développement, Paris, Pedone, 2011.
M. FORTEAU, “ L’État selon le droit international: une figure à géométrie variable? ”, RGDIP, vol. 4, 2007, pp. 762-763.
TPI, Secretário, 2009/404/SA/LASS, 23 de janeiro de 2009.
TPI, Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Câmara Preliminar II, ICC-01/09, 31 de março de 2010.
ONU, Assembleia Geral. Follow-Up to the Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, Doc. ONU A/64/651, 4 de fevereiro de 2010
ONU, Assembleia Geral. Second Follow-Up to the Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, Doc. ONU, A/64/890, 11 de agosto de 2010.
ICC, Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Germain Katanga against the Oral Decision of Trial Chamber II of 12 June 2009 on the Admissibility of the Case, Câmara de Recursos, ICC-01/04-01/07 OA 8, 25 de setembro de 2009.
TPI, Gabinete do Procurador, Policy Paper on Preliminary Examinations, 2013
TPI, Gabinete do Procurador, Letter from ICC Director, Jurisdiction, Complementarity and Cooperation Division to Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, OPT/INCOM/PSE/OHCHR-1/JCCD-Ag, janeiro de 2010.
R. CHARVIN, “Droit international et conflit israélo-palestinien”, comunicação apresentada no colóquio “Où en est la Palestine?, organizado por R. PORTEILLA e P. ICARD, na Universidade de Bourgogne (França), em 18 de novembro de 2014.
C. MAIA, K. HAMA, “La Cour pénale internationale vue d’Afrique: organe juridictionnel ou organe politique?”, L’Observateur des Nations Unies, vol. 32, 2012, pp. 75-98.
C. MAIA, “Les positions politiques et les justifications juridiques des États au regard de la reconnaissance (ou non reconnaissance) de la qualité d’État de la Palestine”, in T. GARCIA (dir.), La Palestine: d’un État non membre de l’Organisation des Nations Unies à un État souverain?, Paris, Pedone, 2016, pp. 95-125.
Y. RONEN, “Recognition of the State of Palestine: Still too Much too Soon?”, in C. CHINKIN, F. BAETENS (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 229-247.
R. BERMEJO GARCÍA, “¿Es Palestina un Estado? Reflexiones a la luz del derecho internacional y de la práctica europea sobre los acontecimientos recientes en torno al reconocimiento de un Estado palestino”, Revista de Estudios Europeos, vol. 65, 2014, pp. 9-40.
M.M. EL ZEIDY, “Ad hoc Declarations of Acceptance of Jurisdiction: The Palestinian Situation under Scrutiny”, in C. STAHN (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 179-209.
J. QUIGLEY, “Palestine is a State so the Consent Declaration is a Valid Basis for Investigation by the ICC”, in R.H. STEINBERG (ed.), Contemporary Issues facing the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Brill/Nijhoff, 2016, pp. 39-50.
C. MELONI, G. TOGNONI (eds.), Is There a Court for Gaza? A Test Bench for International Justice, The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2012.
J. DUGARD, “Palestine and the International Criminal Court: Institutional Failure or Bias?”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 11, 2013, pp. 563-570.
A. ZIMMERMANN, “Palestine and the International Criminal Court Quo Vadis? Reach and Limits of Declarations Under Article 12(3)”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 11, 2013, pp. 303-329.
M.C. KEARNEY, “Palestine and the International Criminal Court”, in Palestine and International Law: New Approaches. Proceedings of the Conference held in Birzeit University, on 24- 26 September 2010, Birzeit, Birzeit University, Institute of Law, 2011, pp. 137-148.
W.T. WORSTER, “The Exercise of Jurisdiction by the International Criminal Court over Palestine”, The American University International Law Review, vol. 26, 2011, pp. 1153-1209.
D. BENOLIEL, R. PERRY, “Israel, Palestine, and the ICC”, Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 32, 2010, pp. 73-127.
TPI, Gabinete do Procurador, “Situation in Palestine”, comunicado de imprensa, 3 de abril de 2012.
A. PELLET, “Les effets de la reconnaissance par la Palestine de la compétence de la Cour pénale internationale”, in Mélanges en l’honneur de Madjid Benchikh. Droit, liberté, paix, développement, Paris, Pedone, 2011.
M. FORTEAU, “ L’État selon le droit international: une figure à géométrie variable? ”, RGDIP, vol. 4, 2007, pp. 762-763.
TPI, Secretário, 2009/404/SA/LASS, 23 de janeiro de 2009.
TPI, Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Câmara Preliminar II, ICC-01/09, 31 de março de 2010.
ONU, Assembleia Geral. Follow-Up to the Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, Doc. ONU A/64/651, 4 de fevereiro de 2010
ONU, Assembleia Geral. Second Follow-Up to the Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, Doc. ONU, A/64/890, 11 de agosto de 2010.
ICC, Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Germain Katanga against the Oral Decision of Trial Chamber II of 12 June 2009 on the Admissibility of the Case, Câmara de Recursos, ICC-01/04-01/07 OA 8, 25 de setembro de 2009.
TPI, Gabinete do Procurador, Policy Paper on Preliminary Examinations, 2013
TPI, Gabinete do Procurador, Letter from ICC Director, Jurisdiction, Complementarity and Cooperation Division to Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, OPT/INCOM/PSE/OHCHR-1/JCCD-Ag, janeiro de 2010.
Downloads
Published
2016-11-24
How to Cite
Maia, C. (2016). PALESTINA E TRIBUNAL PENAL INTERNACIONAL: RETORNO A UMA SAGA JUDICIAL. Journal of the Brazilian Institute of Human Rights, 16(16). Retrieved from https://revista.ibdh.org.br/index.php/ibdh/article/view/345
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The opinions expressed by the authors are their exclusive responsibility and do not necessarily represent the understanding of the Brazilian Institute of Human Rights and/or its Editorial Board.
The author will not be paid for the cession and publication of his/her paper, and may receive two copies of the issue in which his/her collaboration appears.
Articles published in this journal may be reproduced in whole or in part, in print and/or electronic, but must cite the name(s) of the author(s) and its publication in this Journal.
The authors authorize the Editorial Board to submit the paper to textual corrections and to necessary changes, including formatting the paper to technical standards.
