EL TEMA DEL DERECHO A LA CIUDAD EN ALGUNOS PENSADORES CONTEMPORÁNEOS
Keywords:
welfare, security, Liquid times, state, privatization, market, consumerism, human waste, refugees, city, polarization, wealth, exclusion, urbanism, dispersion, humanism, planning, public places, interactionAbstract
Three different points of view regarding the “the exercise of rights to the city”. This is annulled when a “liquid” society (Bauman) segregates people which constitute a growing number of “disposable” individuals, which are isolated and cornered, creating enclaves of a “rich” class (Secchi), which restrains the common rights that everyone should have to the city. The solution is to create human and livable cities (Gehl), which favor the human interaction and communication.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The opinions expressed by the authors are their exclusive responsibility and do not necessarily represent the understanding of the Brazilian Institute of Human Rights and/or its Editorial Board.
The author will not be paid for the cession and publication of his/her paper, and may receive two copies of the issue in which his/her collaboration appears.
Articles published in this journal may be reproduced in whole or in part, in print and/or electronic, but must cite the name(s) of the author(s) and its publication in this Journal.
The authors authorize the Editorial Board to submit the paper to textual corrections and to necessary changes, including formatting the paper to technical standards.
