THE USE OF PROVISIONAL/INTERIM MEASURES BY INTERNATIONAL COURTS IN CASES OF MASS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF ICJ, UNHRC, IACTHR AND ECTHR PRACTICE
Abstract
In situations of mass human rights violations, one of the most powerful tools available to international courts is the use of interim (also termed provisional or precautionary) measures. Such measures are designed to prevent irreparable harm from occurring in the interim period before a final judgment on the merits of a case can be rendered. This paper compares the practice of four of the key international human rights bodies and draws attention to fundamental commonalities in their application of interim measures.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The opinions expressed by the authors are their exclusive responsibility and do not necessarily represent the understanding of the Brazilian Institute of Human Rights and/or its Editorial Board.
The author will not be paid for the cession and publication of his/her paper, and may receive two copies of the issue in which his/her collaboration appears.
Articles published in this journal may be reproduced in whole or in part, in print and/or electronic, but must cite the name(s) of the author(s) and its publication in this Journal.
The authors authorize the Editorial Board to submit the paper to textual corrections and to necessary changes, including formatting the paper to technical standards.